Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santana Gohain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Santana Gohain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable as although I found links here, here, here, here and here. So with hardly any change since starting in July 2008, no recent or better sourcing and thus improvement, there's nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - I found some coverage on several of the search engines, but of the mention variety. A couple were slightly beefed up mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet the notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: concur with !vote above. The bio is not a pure resume entry, she has some minor coverage, but I am not finding any profiles of her. On the other hand, to cite WP:OTHERSTUFF wrongfully, this one is better than many other shameless artist bios out there.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Passing mentions but not enough coverage in reliable sources to write a proper article. Jujutacular (talk) 21:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.